Southern New Jersey is well-known for its collection of
patterned-brickwork houses built in the eighteenth century and associated with
Quaker settlement. Here is found the highest concentration of these
houses among the ten eastern states where examples have been noted.[1] Salem and Burlington Counties have
the highest numbers. Despite their notoriety, however, a
comprehensive, official inventory has never been made. That is about to change,
though the number is a moving target, with new discoveries being made, and
known examples succumbing to demolition. Surprisingly, and unfortunately,
despite their high cultural value, they are still disappearing; sadly, few are
protected. But this article concerns a new discovery.
A 2001 survey form in the New Jersey State Historic
Preservation Office (SHPO) named a masonry house at 349 Fort Elfsborg-Hancock’s
Bridge Road in Elsinboro Township, the “Sarah Mason House,” and claimed it to
be a patterned brickwork house. No previous chronicler of early Salem County
houses known to this author has ever made mention of this house. Not historians
Thomas Shourds, Cushing and Sheppard, Joseph Sickler, Paul Love, George Walter
Johnson, or Michael Chiarrapa, nor does it appear on the 1975 “Souvenir Map of
Salem County Historical Sites,” which locates buildings constructed before the
Revolutionary War. [2] This is surprising, considering the wide
attention that has been given to Salem County patterned brickwork houses.
The house faces north on the road leading from the Fort
Elfsborg vicinity on the Delaware River east toward Hancock’s Bridge. It stands
three stories, has a squarish footprint, a symmetrical façade with a central
doorway, a low-sloping roof, and is parged, or stuccoed. It stands back
from the road on a small rise, up a fenced lane, surrounded by the outbuildings
and farm fields of an active farm. Behind it, in the distance, rises the plumed
cooling tower at the nuclear power plant on Artificial Island.
John and Jale Mason House built 1722 in Elsinboro Township in February, 2016. Now confirmed as a patterned-brickwork house. Photo © 2017 Janet L. Sheridan. |
The surveyor reported seeing inscribed bricks on the house,
including one that said “Sarah Mason,” and therefore named the house
accordingly. It was common for owners and builders to inscribe bricks
with their initials, in addition to the vitrified header designs. Often they
are found adjacent to the front door, but I’ve seen them at the top of a door,
in a side wall, and in the peak of the gable (in that case, it was probably a
builder). To see an entire name in a brick is unusual, however.
Robert Craig, a senior historic preservation specialist at
the SHPO who oversees National Register of Historic Places applications, has
been working on a first-ever state inventory of patterned brickwork houses. Bob
wants to count not only surviving examples, but the ones that have been lost as
well. He recently prepared a thematic National Register nomination (called a
Multiple Property Documentation form) entitled "Traditional Patterned-Brickwork
Architecture in New Jersey" for this significant type of early American
architecture. Finally, we have a context under which any such house could be
nominated and listed. Listing is both protective and honorific.
The English Quakers who began settling in west New Jersey in
1675 brought a tradition of patterned brickwork architecture with them from
England. Popular there for major buildings in the sixteenth century and for
minor buildings in the seventeenth century, the practice had originated in France. [3]
Culturally, the practice functioned in Fenwick’s Colony to visually express the
power of landed elites and reinforce the cohesiveness of the Quaker community. [4] Their
relatively good survival rates, due to their very durable brick construction,
compared to the nil survivorship of the sort of house that most people lived
in—small wood frame or plank houses—has unfortunately biased the modern
impression of the eighteenth-century landscape. But in these houses we can seek
to understand that upper class of people who controlled the land and held the
economic, political and social power of the day.
Bob and I took to the field on a cold day in February 2016
to sleuth out parged brick houses that may be hiding patterns. We logged
several in Salem, and then moved down to Elsinboro. Mustering our courage, we
brazenly drove up the driveway of the so-called Sara Mason House and followed
it around the house through the farmyard. We knocked at the back door,
not knowing what kind of reception we would get. The owner, John Webber,
greeted us, and hearing our interest, graciously came out to show us the
evidence we were after.
We indeed saw the reported incised bricks, as well as
Flemish checker bond over the front door where the parge had fallen off.
A pent roof had once hung over the first story, a feature most of these houses
had. The incised bricks had been purposely exposed, commemorating the
inscribers. One brick said “Jale M 1722,” and the other, below it, said “Sarah
Mason.” Were we happy that we were able to confirm the 2001 sighting, and
it seemed we had the construction date as well, but now we had more questions.
Who were Jale M and Sarah Mason? Were they the ones responsible for the house?
These are both female names, but though there are a few cases where only a
man’s name is on such a house, we are unaware of a case where a single woman
was responsible for the construction of one. Initialed patterns were typically
emblematic of a married couple, symbolizing the importance of family and the
equal role of the woman in the partnership.
The incised bricks exposed behind the stucco. Jale M. 1722, and Sarah Mason. Sarah added two horizontal line flourishes at both ends of her brick. Photo © 2017 Janet L. Sheridan. |
Flemish checker bond is visible at the right and left of center where a front porch was once attached, stuccoed around, and removed. Photo © 2017 Janet L. Sheridan. |
This house stands on Fort Elfsborg-Hancock’s Bridge Road, just west of another early house called the Morris-Goodwin House, which was recorded by the Historic American Building Survey (HABS) in 1941.[5] An unusual combination of a dovetail-cornered plank house, timber frame extensions, and a patterned brickwork shed addition, it pre-dates 1739. It and the land from there west to the Delaware River was part of the 1200-acre Redroe Morris plantation, which was inherited by his son Lewis Morris. The Redroe Morris House, believed to be built in 1688, still stands, embedded within an enlarged house on the river shore near the site of the former Salem County Country Club. The so-called Sarah Mason House stands on what was Morris’ plantation, not on the tract of John Mason, further east. Was M for Morris? If so, what was Sarah Mason doing here and why was she privileged to carve a brick with her name?
The HABS 1941 report, together with William Wade Hinshaw’s Encyclopedia of
American Quaker Genealogy, provided the pieces to solve the puzzle. By
connecting people to buildings, land, and these incised brick artifacts, and by
looking at milestones in people’s lives, the story of a house can emerge.
Fortunately, the Quakers kept detailed records of their members’ births, deaths
and marriages, and Hinshaw transcribed all known records in 1938.
The first linkage came with a look at the history of the
Morris family. Redroe/Rudra/Rudderah/Rothrock Morris married Jael Batty in
1688. Both were born about 1658 in Wales and England, respectively, and
arrived in New Jersey in 1683 and 1686, respectively. [6] Jael is a Biblical name, and is
pronounced JAY-əl or JAYL. It was sometimes written "Jail," which
sounds like "Jale," which is the name inscribed in the brick. It’s an
uncommon name. And so is Redroe, who was in the neighborhood. It seems
reasonable to conclude that the "Jale M" on the brick is Jael Morris,
since this was Morris land. But read on.
Rothra (yet another spelling for Redroe) Morris purchased of Samuel and Hannah Carpenter of Philadelphia a 1200-acre plantation called “Elsinburgh” and 400 acres of marsh and islands along the Delaware River in 1701. He died in 1704, leaving his entire plantation to his wife Jael, unless she remarried, then to his five sons, of whom three survived to marry (Joseph, David, and Lewis Morris). To Lewis he devised the tenant plantation of Henry Walmsley, believed to be the Morris-Goodwin House next door to our subject house, but since he was a child of seven at the time of his father’s death, he would not have occupied it until he had come of age and married.[7] But this record tells us that the Sarah Mason House stands on what was the Morris plantation.
Women in those days, with no legal rights of their own, usually remarried after the death of a spouse out of necessity. Jael Morris did so, marrying John Lewis in 1706.[8] Because she remarried, the plantation then became her sons' though they were still underage. We don't know if Lewis, Jael, and her children continued to live in the Morris house on the bank of the river or elsewhere with John Lewis. But later, the sons may have built houses of their own on their allotments upon their majority and marriages. Joseph reached 21 in 1713 and married Prudence Boughwhite in 1721, Lewis in 1716 and married Grace Woodnutt in 1719 (but would have occupied the Morris-Goodwin house), and David in 1718 and married Jean Jeffery in 1721.[9] The house in question, according to the brick, was built in 1722, so could be the house of one of the sons (David or Joseph). But the plot thickens...
Jael Batty Morris Lewis, apparently widowed again at age 58, married John Mason in 1716.[10] So, in 1722 she was Jael Mason, therefore, "Jale M" is Jale Mason, not Morris. She must have married John Mason the immigrant, her neighbor and contemporary, which means that his wife Sarah died sometime after 1710 when their last child was born. [11] There was only one other Sarah Mason of record during this time who could be the Sarah Mason on the brick—a daughter of John and Sarah Mason, born 1704.[12] She would have been 18 years old in 1722, underage and living with her father and step-mother, perhaps in John Mason’s first house, built in 1695 and 1704 on Money Island Road to the east. Therefore, it seems, six years after John and Jale married, when they were in their 60s, they vacated his old homestead (perhaps to his oldest son John, who was then 25 years old) and built a new house on land belonging to one of Jale’s sons. There, in the newly laid bricks, Sarah and Jale Mason carved their names for posterity, which a later builder opted not to hide.
Rothra (yet another spelling for Redroe) Morris purchased of Samuel and Hannah Carpenter of Philadelphia a 1200-acre plantation called “Elsinburgh” and 400 acres of marsh and islands along the Delaware River in 1701. He died in 1704, leaving his entire plantation to his wife Jael, unless she remarried, then to his five sons, of whom three survived to marry (Joseph, David, and Lewis Morris). To Lewis he devised the tenant plantation of Henry Walmsley, believed to be the Morris-Goodwin House next door to our subject house, but since he was a child of seven at the time of his father’s death, he would not have occupied it until he had come of age and married.[7] But this record tells us that the Sarah Mason House stands on what was the Morris plantation.
Women in those days, with no legal rights of their own, usually remarried after the death of a spouse out of necessity. Jael Morris did so, marrying John Lewis in 1706.[8] Because she remarried, the plantation then became her sons' though they were still underage. We don't know if Lewis, Jael, and her children continued to live in the Morris house on the bank of the river or elsewhere with John Lewis. But later, the sons may have built houses of their own on their allotments upon their majority and marriages. Joseph reached 21 in 1713 and married Prudence Boughwhite in 1721, Lewis in 1716 and married Grace Woodnutt in 1719 (but would have occupied the Morris-Goodwin house), and David in 1718 and married Jean Jeffery in 1721.[9] The house in question, according to the brick, was built in 1722, so could be the house of one of the sons (David or Joseph). But the plot thickens...
Jael Batty Morris Lewis, apparently widowed again at age 58, married John Mason in 1716.[10] So, in 1722 she was Jael Mason, therefore, "Jale M" is Jale Mason, not Morris. She must have married John Mason the immigrant, her neighbor and contemporary, which means that his wife Sarah died sometime after 1710 when their last child was born. [11] There was only one other Sarah Mason of record during this time who could be the Sarah Mason on the brick—a daughter of John and Sarah Mason, born 1704.[12] She would have been 18 years old in 1722, underage and living with her father and step-mother, perhaps in John Mason’s first house, built in 1695 and 1704 on Money Island Road to the east. Therefore, it seems, six years after John and Jale married, when they were in their 60s, they vacated his old homestead (perhaps to his oldest son John, who was then 25 years old) and built a new house on land belonging to one of Jale’s sons. There, in the newly laid bricks, Sarah and Jale Mason carved their names for posterity, which a later builder opted not to hide.
It is unlikely, though, that these bricks were laid one
above the other originally, because normally, above the center of a brick is a
vertical mortar joint between two bricks lying halfway over the one below. They
were probably relocated during the re-fenestration in the mid-nineteenth
century, probably from a center doorway flanked by two windows to a five-bay,
or Georgian, arrangement, symmetrically flanked by four windows. It is also
likely that these bricks were originally adjacent to the front doorway, which
was apparently widened with flanking sidelights. They were stacked to be
conveniently viewable in a rectangular opening in the stucco near the corner of
the house. One can only imagine what pattern in vitrified blue-gray brick lies
under the stucco in the gable ends to tell us more about this house, family,
and patterned brickwork in Salem County and New Jersey.
This chain of events seems a reasonable scenario for how
this house came to be, though undoubtedly there is much more to the story. But
it’s enough to give it a historic name--the John and Jale Mason House.
John Mason's first house, up to now known simply as the John Mason House,
should therefore be known as the John and Sarah Mason House to distinguish
it from this one, and to appropriately acknowledge Sarah’s historical existence
and role in their shared enterprise.
I would appreciate any leads on other stuccoed-over (or
painted-over) potential pattern-brickwork houses, non-stuccoed examples that
may yet be in hiding, or information on demolished examples. Please email
me at janet@downjerseyheritage.com. Thanks!
[1] Paul
Love, “Patterned Brickwork in the American Colonies” (Diss., Columbia
University, 1950).
[2] Thomas
Shourds, History and Genealogy of
Fenwick’s Colony, New Jersey (Bridgeton, N.J.: G.F. Nixon, 1876); Thomas
Cushing and Charles E. Sheppard, History
of the Counties of Gloucester, Salem and Cumberland, New Jersey (Philadelphia:
Everts & Peck, 1883; repr. Woodbury, NJ: Gloucester County Historical
Society, 1974); Joseph Sickler, The Old
Houses of Salem County (Salem, NJ: Sunbeam Publishing, 1949); George Walter Johnson, 27 in 76: Patterned-Brick Houses of Salem County (Pennsville, N.
J.: George Walter Johnson, 1977); and Michael Joseph Chiarappa, “’The first and
best sort’: Quakerism, Brick Artisanry, and the Vernacular Aesthetics of
Eighteenth-Century West New Jersey Pattern Brickwork Architecture” (PhD diss.
University of Pennsylvania, 1992).
[3]
Paul
Love, Ibid, 8-10. It should be noted that in England the practice was not exclusive
to Quakers, but was an English and a class practice. The English learned it from the French, who
had abandoned it earlier and hence did not bring it to the American colonies.
[4] Michael Chiarrapa, Ibid. People of other faiths, such as Anglicans,
Presbyterians and Baptist also build in patterned brickwork, but their houses were
much fewer in number, which speaks to the early social dominance and influence of
the Quakers.
[5] HABS,
Morris Goodwin house, NJ-690. http://www.loc.gov/pictures/collection/hh/item/nj0780/ (accessed
March 1, 2016).
[6] William
Wade Hinshaw,
Vol 2, 35. http://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015038929710;view=1up;seq=15
[7] HABS NJ-690,
“Written Historical and Descriptive Data,” citing Salem Deeds, Book 7, p. 128,
abstracted in N.J Archives XXI, 632. http://www.loc.gov/pictures/collection/hh/item/nj0780/
(accessed
March 1, 2016).
[8] Ibid,
83.
[9] Ibid,
88.
[10] Ibid, 83,
86.
[11] Ibid,
34. Sarah Mason’s death was not noted in Hinshaw.
[12] Ibid, 34.